Choosing a language:
Hi! in my current quest of writing a useable wayland compositing window manager I have gone down a deep rabbit hole.
The wlroots repository lists the following wrapper libraries:
Don’t be fooled by this list! All of these wrapper libraries are unmaintained apart from Python and Zig 😔.
With the above in mind, I have tried multiple languages to write a compositor with and here are my cumulative thoughts:
I simply don’t want to write my compositor in C as it’s easy to shoot yourself in the foot with it.
Same reasons as C, and on top of that importing wlroots headers into C++ in itself is a messy task including prepocessor re-definitions etc.
It was initially working till it didn’t…
I’m still not quite sure why the callbacks that I had registered didn’t work.
If you do, feel free to reach out to me via Email or via GitHub issue.
Zig is a fine language to use for compositors given the amazing work @Ifreund has put in which includes but is not limited to:
- Zig-pixman - Pixman bindings.
- Zig-wayland - Libwayland bindings.
- Zig-wlroots - Wlroots bindings.
- Zig-xkbcommon - Xkbcommon bindings.
That being said, Zig is still an unstable language which hasn’t even had a 1.0 release yet.
Hence I don’t want to commit to writing my entire stack in Zig just yet.
Although Smithay isn’t the same as wlroots, it’s still a worthy candidate to mention on this list due to the fact that you can write compositors which are just as functional with it too.
I’ve recently started contributing to wayland-rs and smithay-client-toolkit and you should too! they’re in need of more contributors and as you can imagine, maintaining pure rust libwayland bindings is a herculean task.
The devs have been nothing but patient with me even when I asked stupid questions over and over again in their matrix channel.
That being said, Smithay just isn’t as mature as wlroots yet. A lot more manual labor is needed just for the tinywl equivalent of wlroots in smithay…you can assume how much it would scale up for a proper usable compositor (None written in smithay yet). This paird with the fact that the wayland-rs API is undergoing a massive breaking change for release candidate 0.3.0, makes it too volatile to commit to in terms of server side just yet.
However, client side API won’t change too much with release candidate 0.3.0 and I’d say it’s a pleasant experience to write wayland clients in rust.
On a separate note, check out the Jay compositor. I think the dev is on crack? they implemented practically everything on their own:
- Wayland protocol.
- Wire protocol.
- Dbus interface.
- EGL wrapper.
- GBM wrapper.
- OpenGL renderer.
The project doesn’t even depend on libwayland!!! 🤯🤯🤯
Python to me is a first class candidate for writing compositors. It’s not easy to shoot yourself in the foot with, simple enough to write and most importantly, it has maintained bindings.
The question might arise “What will you do when the bindings are no longer maintained?”.
I don’t think qtile will become irrelevant anytime soon hence the bindings will stay maintained for a long time.
“What does qtile have to do with wlroots python bindings?”, pywlroots and pywayland are both maintained by Sean Vig from the qtile team!
It should come of no surprise to you that I picked python. I have created the repo and invited a friend of mine to develop NextWM with me.
Source Code Availability and Support:
I will follow through with one of the following:
Keep the source private until get paid to release it. If I do get paid, I will provide 100% support for the lifetime of the project. This is because I’m tired of offering my free labor, I write my software to teach myself and use in my workflow and not to provide support for other issues which are irrelevant to my usecase.
Keep the code open-source under 0BSD license and stop giving a fuck about bug reports/feature requests I get which are irrelevant to me unless I get paid to escalate their priority. I made the mistake of caring too much with swhkd and instead got back github issues like such: “see man sxhkd to know other modifiers that sxhkd support instead of waiting people to report them one by one”
I’m sorry but I wrote swhkd for my usecase as I needed a hotkey daemon and I bind features as and when requested if I don’t need them already. I don’t like that attitude.
I kept this out of the GitHub issue tracker to keep it professional but that comment made me realize that I cared too much about what people think of my project so it can gain more popularity.
This is in no way an invitation to harass the author of the issue and is only my thoughts on the matter.
That is all for now, have a nice day 😀.